NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Marcus [2016] NSWCCA 237 Hearing dates: 21 October 2016 Date of orders: 21 October 2016 Decision date: 26 October 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] R A Hulme J at [41] Wilson J at [42] Decision: Bail refused. Catchwords: Bail Act 2013 – Detention Application by Crown – attempted murder and a firearm offence – accused and complainant members of rival criminal gangs – likely delay before trial not excessive – strong Crown case – inapplicability of "principle of restraint" – "show cause" test not made out – alternatively accused would constitute an unacceptable risk if released on bail. Legislation Cited: Bail Act 2013 – ss 16A, 16B, 50, 68 Crimes Act 1900 – ss 29, 33(1)(a), 93T(4A) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) – s 68A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 – s 5D Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Mawad [2015] NSWCCA 227 R v Budiman (1997) 97 A Crim R 548 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Louizos [2008] NSWCA 220 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Louizos [2008] NSWCA 271 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Tikomaimaleya [2015] NSWCA 83 DPP v SKA (formerly DPP v AZ) [2009] NSWCA 51 R v Roberts & Lardner (1997) 97 A Crim R 456 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina – Applicant Crown Samer Marcus - Respondent Representation: Counsel: E Balodis – Applicant Crown AJ Karim - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate