NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: AK v R [2016] NSWCCA 238 Hearing dates: 16 March 2016 Decision date: 28 October 2016 Before: Beazley P at [1] Johnson J at [2] Harrison J at [136] Decision: 1. Applicant granted an extension of time to 8 October 2015 to make application for leave to appeal against sentence.
2. Applicant granted leave to appeal against sentence.
3. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – Applicant sentenced for child sexual offences contrary to s.66C(2) and s.61M(2) Crimes Act 1900 – two female victims aged between nine and 11 years – whether trial Judge erred in manner in which he took into account uncharged sexual misconduct of Applicant – error demonstrated – whether sentencing Judge erred in approach to Applicant's remorse and risk of reoffending – no error demonstrated – independent sentencing discretion exercised in accordance with Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 252 CLR 601 – serious examples of offending of this type – Applicant's limited insight and remorse – no lesser sentence warranted – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 Crimes Act 1900 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Child Sex Offences) Act 2015 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Attorney General's Application Under Section 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No. 1 of 2002 [2002] NSWCCA 518; 56 NSWLR 146 BIP v R [2011] NSWCCA 224 Clarke v R [2009] NSWCCA 49 Corby v R [2010] NSWCCA 146 Giles v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2009] NSWCCA 308; 198 A Crim R 395 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 252 CLR 601 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 McGrath v R [2010] NSWCCA 48; 199 A Crim R 527 MJL v R [2007] NSWCCA 261 Mun v R [2015] NSWCCA 234 NW v R [2011] NSWCCA 178 R v Gavel [2014] NSWCCA 56; 239 A Crim R 469 R v Gommerson [2014] NSWCCA 159; 243 A Crim R 534 R v JCW [2000] NSWCCA 209; 112 A Crim R 466 R v Palu [2002] NSWCCA 381; 134 A Crim R 174 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353; 127 A Crim R 362 R v Van Ryn [2016] NSWCCA 1 Category: Principal judgment Parties: AK (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms C Wasley (Applicant) Mr E Balodis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate