NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Stenlake v Whipps (No. 2) [2016] NSWSC 1520 Hearing dates: 6 June and 24 August 2016 Date of orders: 28 October 2016 Decision date: 28 October 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Order the defendants/cross-claimants to pay interest under Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 100 on the sum of $80,000 from 29 January 2013 to 24 August 2016. Order the defendants/cross-claimants to pay two thirds of the plaintiff's costs of these proceedings. Catchwords: INTEREST AND COSTS – Court orders – equitable charge in the sum of $100,000 over defendant's/cross-claimant's property – cross-claimant succeeds in order for return of Mercedes Benz motor vehicle to estate – whether interest up to judgment should be awarded on the sum of $100,000 – what costs order should be made. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 100 District Court Act 1973, s 134(1)(h) Property (Relationships) Act 1984 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 ("UCPR"), rr 42.30(2), 42.34 Cases Cited: Kardos v Sarbett (No. 2) [2006] NSWCA 206 Ruby v Marsh (1975) 132 CLR 642 Screenco Pty Ltd v RL Dew Pty Ltd [2003] 58 NSWLR 720 Stenlake v Whipps [2016] NSWSC 719 Category: Costs Parties: Plaintiff: Richard Stenlake Representation: Counsel
Plaintiff: Mr J.M. Ireland QC Defendants: Ms R. Winfield
Solicitor
Plaintiff: Daniel McGirr, McGirr Lawyers Defendants: Sean Christian Radburn, Somerville Laundry Lomax File Number(s): 2014/46275 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate