NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Insurance Australia Limited t/as NRMA Insurance Limited v Milton [2016] NSWSC 1521 Hearing dates: 20 October 2016 Date of orders: 20 October 2016 Decision date: 20 October 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: (1) Amended Summons filed 20 October 2016 dismissed. (2) Plaintiff's Notice of Motion filed 6 October 2016 be otherwise dismissed. (3) Plaintiff pay the first defendant's costs. Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW – decision of Assessor refusing to exempt claim from CARS assessment – insurer alleged plaintiff made false and misleading statements about extent of his injuries – insurer relied on allegedly inconsistent statements made by insured but did not specify which were misleading – alleged Assessor failed to address insurer's claim for exemption because of failure to identify which statement was misleading – HELD: Assessor reasoned that failure to identify which statements were misleading meant not satisfied matter unsuitable for CARS Assessment – no error shown Legislation Cited: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) Motor Accidents (Lifetime Care and Support) Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Allianz Australia Limited v Tarabay [2013] NSWSC 141; 62 MVR 537 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26; 77 ALJR 1088 Insurance Australia Limited t/as NRMA Insurance v Banos [2013] NSWSC 1519 Insurance Australia v Milton [2015] NSWSC 1392 Insurance Australia Limited t/as NRMA Insurance v Milton (2016) NSWCA 156 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend [1986] HCA 40; (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; [1996] 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj [2002] HCA 11; (2002) 209 CLR 597 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Insurance Australia Limited t/as NRMA Insurance Limited (Plaintiff) Trent Milton (First Defendant) Margaret Holz, in her capacity as a Claims Assessor of the State Insurance Regulatory Authority (Second Defendant) State Insurance Regulatory Authority (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: W Fitzsimmons; C Jackson (Plaintiff) KP Rewell SC; PJ Frame (First Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate