NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Romolo v R [2016] NSWCCA 240 Hearing dates: 2 August 2016 Date of orders: 02 August 2016 Decision date: 31 October 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Button J at [2] N Adams J at [49] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – application for permanent stay of proceedings – threat made against applicant and his family – whether trial judge failed to have regard to prejudice to applicant in presentation of his case at trial – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), Sch, ss 11.2A(1), 307.1 Cases Cited: Dupas v The Queen (2010) 241 CLR 237; [2010] HCA 20 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Hughes v R [2015] NSWCCA 330 TS v The Queen [2014] NSWCCA 174 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Marco Romolo Regina Representation: Counsel: M Thangaraj SC (Applicant) T D Anderson (Respondent) C Dobraszczyk (Respondent)
Solicitors: Horowitz & Bilinsky Solicitors (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2012/334189 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 27 July 2016 Before: Lakatos SC DCJ File Number(s): 2012/334189
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate