NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Malek Fahd Islamic School Limited [2016] NSWSC 1529 Hearing dates: 18 October 2016 Date of orders: 31 October 2016 Decision date: 31 October 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: (1) On or before 14 November 2016, the cross-claimant serve a further draft cross-claim on the cross-defendants.
(2) The parties confer in relation to the orders necessary to dispose of the cross-claimant's Notice of Motion filed 29 September 2016 and the cross-defendant's Notice of Motion filed 11 October 2016.
(3) The proceedings stand over for directions at 9:30am on 28 November 2016 before Beech-Jones J. Catchwords: PLEADINGS – application for leave to file cross-claim – application to strike out existing cross claim – Education Act – prohibition on provision of assistance to non-government school operating for profit – cross-claim seeks judicial review of decision to refuse funding – whether challenge lacks utility because of later decisions – whether school operating for profit is jurisdictional fact or only opinion that school is operating for profit is a jurisdictional fact – arguable questions of statutory construction not decided on application for leave or application to strike out pleading Legislation Cited: Education Act 1990 (NSW) Education Amendment (Not-for-profit Non-Government School Funding) Act 2014 (NSW) Cases Cited: Auckland Harbour Board v The King [1924] AC 318 Comptroller‑General of Customs v ACI PET Operations Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 56 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Conyngham (1986) 11 FCR 528 Plaintiff M70/2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship; ("the Malaysian Declaration case") [2011] HCA 32; (2011) 244 CLR 144 Timbarra Protection Coalition Inc v Ross Mining NL & Ors (1999) 46 NSWLR 55 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Malek Fahd Islamic School Limited (Defendant/Cross Claimant) Minister for Education (Cross Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms J Davidson (Plaintiff) Mr A Cheshire SC (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate