NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Glad Corporate Services v Demet Taskin [2016] NSWSC 1532 Hearing dates: 30 September 2016 Date of orders: 31 October 2016 Decision date: 31 October 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Access to the documents sought on the seven subpoenas granted to both parties. Defendants/cross-claimants given first access to all documents. Directions made in the event of argument about costs. Catchwords: SUBPOENAS – defendants/cross-claimants apply to set aside seven subpoenas issued to third parties by the plaintiffs/cross-defendants – no objection taken by the recipients of the subpoenas to the production of the documents requested - whether access to the documents sought will serve a legitimate forensic purpose in the proceedings. Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), Part 3.6 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.1 ("UCPR") Cases Cited: Alister v R (1984) 154 CLR 404 Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales v Dylan Chidgey [2008] NSWCCA 65 R v Saleam [1999] NSWCCA 86 Waind v Hill and National Employers' Mutual General Insurance Association Ltd (1978) 1 NSWLR 372 Category: Principal judgment Parties: First Plaintiff: Glad Corporate Services Pty Ltd Second Plaintiff: Glad Group Pty Ltd Third Plaintiff: Natajle Iloski
First Defendant: Demet Taskin Second Defendant: Tanem Taskin Representation: Counsel: Plaintiffs: K. Nomchong SC and A.Britt Defendants: J. Williams
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate