NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bechara trading as Bechara and Company v Bates [2016] NSWCA 294 Hearing dates: 27 May 2016 and subsequently on the papers Date of orders: 01 November 2016 Decision date: 01 November 2016 Before: Beazley P; Meagher JA; Payne JA Decision: The lump-sum costs order payable by the applicant to the respondent in the sum of $12,000 pursuant to s 98 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) be payable by the applicant within 28 days. Catchwords: COSTS – Chorley exception – respondent barrister – respondent instructed solicitors and appeared for himself as counsel – respondent made application for gross sum costs order in respect of a) solicitors' costs and disbursements excluding counsel's fees and b) counsel's fees for professional work performed by respondent himself – whether definition of "costs" contained in s 3 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) does away with Chorley exception – whether Chorley exception applies to self-represented barrister Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 3, 98 Evidence Act 2005 (NSW) s 91 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 26 Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) ss 4, 364 Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) ss 6, 172, 178 Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW) Part 7 Div 3 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ada Evans Chambers P/L v Santisi [2014] NSWSC 538 Atlas v Kalyk [2001] NSWCA 10 Auspine Ltd v Australian Newsprint Mills Ltd (1999) 93 FCR 1; [1999] FCA 673 Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No 2) (1995) 57 FCR 119 Bechara v Bates (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 1722 Beling v Sixty International SA (2015) 228 FCR 194; [2015] FCA 250 Cachia v Hanes (1994) 179 CLR 403 Dobree v Hoffman (1996) 18 WAR 36 Guss v Veenhuizen (1976) 136 CLR 34 Hamod v New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738; [2002] NSWCA 213 Khera v Jones [2006] NSWCA 85 London Scottish Benefit Society v Chorley, Crawford and Chester (1884) 13 QBD 872 McIlraith v Ilkin (Costs) [2007] NSWSC 1052 Murphy v Legal Services Commissioner (No 2) [2013] QSC 253 Penson v Titan National Pty Ltd (No 3) [2015] NSWCA 121 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 Wang v Farkas (2014) 85 NSWLR 390; [2014] NSWCA 29 Wilkie v Brown [2016] NSWCA 128 Winn v Garland Hawthorn Brahe (No 1) [2007] VSC 360 Category: Costs Parties: Maria Bechara trading as Bechara and Company (Applicant) Philip Bates (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: No appearance for the applicant Respondent appeared for himself as counsel
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate