NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Li v R [2016] NSWDC 275 Hearing dates: 5 February 2016 Date of orders: 05 February 2016 Decision date: 05 February 2016 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Neilson DCJ Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Severity appeal – Intentionally damage motor vehicle – Following parking dispute, the Appellant "keyed" the victim's motor vehicle causing $3,806 damage – Appellant denied offence during ERISP – Found guilty after hearing – Compensation paid following order of Local Court – No evidence of remorse – Appellant a Chinese immigrant and permanent resident – No objective evidence supporting Appellant's fear of a conviction interfering with visa status nor her working with children Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Road Transport (General) Act 2005 Cases Cited: Hoffenberg v The District Court of New South Wales [2010] NSWCA 142 R v Mauger [2012] NSWCCA 51 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Xiaotang Li (Appellant) Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Respondent) Representation: Mr D Petrushnko (Appellant) Solicitor for the Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2015/132349 Publication restriction: No Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Hornsby Local Court Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 2 November 2015 Before: Viney LCM File Number(s): 2015/132349
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate