NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Huang [2016] NSWSC 1544 Hearing dates: 1 November 2016 Date of orders: 03 November 2016 Decision date: 03 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison J Decision: (1) Set aside the subpoena filed on 1 August 2016 by Shana Huang. (2) Make no order as to costs. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – subpoena – application to set aside – where subpoena issued in relation to transcript of examination of person connected with alleged offence – where property of defendant suspected to be proceeds of crime – where Commissioner seeking forfeiture of defendant's property – whether defendant established that the documents that were the subject of the subpoena were sufficiently relevant to justify production Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Criminal Code Act 1995 Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Denlay v Commissioner of Taxation (2010) 276 ALR 675; [2010] FCA 1434 McKinnon v Secretary, Department of the Treasury (2006) 208 CLR 423; [2006] HCA 45 Re VBN and Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (2006) 92 ALD 455 Seven Network Limited v News Limited (No 11) [2006] FCA 174 White v Tulloch (1995) 19 Fam LR 696 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (Plaintiff) Shana Huang (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G O'Mahoney (Plaintiff) P English (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate