NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Link 2 Pty Ltd v Ezystay Systems Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 317 Hearing dates: 20 July 2016 Decision date: 22 November 2016 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Ward JA at [2]; Leeming JA at [240] Decision: (1) Refuse leave to the appellants and cross-appellants respectively to appeal/cross-appeal. (2) Dismiss the notice- of appeal and notice of cross-appeal as incompetent. (3) Each party to pay its own costs of the proceedings in this Court. Catchwords: APPEAL – whether leave required for appeal/cross-appeal – respective complaints by appellants/cross-appellants as to ambit of injunctive relief granted by primary judge – complaint by appellants as to apportionment of costs – leave required for both appeal and cross-appeal – leave refused
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION – whether respondents' software, business manuals and other documents were confidential
DIRECTORS – duties owed to companies – whether use by third appellant of respondents' documents amounted to breach of statutory and fiduciary duties Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 182, 183, 1317H Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 55, 79, 135 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101(2)(r) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 31.28, 42.1 Cases Cited: AG Australia Holdings Ltd v Burton [2002] NSWSC 454; (2002) 58 IPR 327 Be Financial Pty Ltd as Trustee for Be Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 164 Bramco Electronics Pty Ltd v ATF Mining Electrics Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCA 392 British Franco Electric Pty Ltd v Dowling Plastics Pty Ltd [1981] 1 NSWLR 448 CEF Holdings Ltd v City Electrical Factors Ltd [2012] EWHC 1524 Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1969] RPC 41 Commercial Plastics v Vincent [1965] 1 QB 623 Dalgety Wine Estates Pty Ltd v Rizzon (1979) 141 CLR 552; [1979] HCA 41 Del Casale v Artedomus (Aust) Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 172; (2007) 73 IPR 326 Drake Personnel Ltd v Beddison [1979] VR 13 Durham v Durham (2011) 80 NSWLR 335; [2011] NSWCA 62 Ezystay Systems Pty Ltd v Link 2 Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 180 Ezystay Systems Pty Ltd v Link 2 Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1105 Ezystay Systems Pty Ltd v Link 2 Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1594 Franchi v Franchi [1967] RPC 149 H&R Block Ltd v Sanott [1976] 1 NZLR 213 Hampson v Hampson [2010] NSWCA 359 Harrison v Project and Design Co (Redcar) Ltd [1978] FSR 81 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Industrial Furnaces Ltd v Reaves [1970] RPC 605 Jaycar Pty Ltd v Lombardo [2011] NSWCA 284 JC Williamson Ltd v Lukey (1931) 45 CLR 282; [1931] HCA 15 Jensen v Ray [2011] NSWCA 247 Lancashire Fires Ltd v SA Lyons & Co Ltd [1996] FSR 629 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705; [2001] NSWCA 305 New South Wales v Stevens (2012) 82 NSWLR 106; [2012] NSWCA 415 Ocular Sciences Ltd v Aspect Vision Care Ltd [1997] RPC 289 Polo Enterprises Australia Pty Ltd v Pinctada Hotels and Resorts Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 397 Saltman Engineering Co Ltd v Campbell Engineering Co Ltd [1963] 3 All ER 413 Seager v Copydex Ltd [1967] 2 All ER 415 United States Surgical Corporation v Hospital Products International Pty Ltd [1983] 2 NSWLR 157 Zomojo Pty Ltd v Hurd (No 2) [2012] FCA 1458 Texts Cited: Dal Pont, Law of Confidentiality (2015, LexisNexis) Dean, The Law of Trade Secrets (1990, LawBook Co) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Link 2 Pty Ltd (First Appellant/First Cross-Respondent) Riches Commercial Pty Ltd (Second Appellant/Second Cross-Respondent) Gregory Moore Riches (Third Appellant/Third Cross-Respondent) Ezystay Systems Pty Ltd (First Respondent/First Cross-Appellant) Ezystay Properties Pty Ltd (Second Respondent/Second Cross-Appellant) Sleeping Operations Pty Ltd (Third Respondent/Third Cross-Appellant) Sleeping with the Enemy Pty Ltd (Fourth Respondent/Fourth Cross-Appellant) Sleeping in Australia Pty Ltd (Fifth Respondent/Fifth Cross-Appellant) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate