NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Silvestri v R [2016] NSWCCA 245 Hearing dates: 5 September 2016 Decision date: 09 November 2016 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Price J at [2]; Hidden AJ at [3]. Decision: 1. Extension of time granted, leave to appeal granted, appeal allowed. 2. Sentence on the count relating to Ms Sparks quashed. 3. Applicant resentenced on that count to imprisonment for 4½ years, comprising a non-parole period of 2½ years, commencing on 1 April 2017 and expiring on 30 September 2019, and a balance of term of 2 years, commencing on 1 October 2019 and expiring on 30 September 2021. Sentences on the other two counts confirmed. Overall sentence of imprisonment for 7 years with a non-parole period of 5 years, commencing on 1 October 2014. Applicant eligible for release on parole on 30 September 2019. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – three counts of driving in a manner dangerous causing grievous bodily harm – appeal in respect of one count only – whether sentence on that count manifestly excessive – whether discount for early plea of guilty adequate – whether total accumulation of that sentence upon the sentences for the other two counts appropriate. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Black v R [2010] NSWCCA 321 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1, [2010] NSWCCA 194 Harrigan v R [2005] NSWCCA 449 Hili and Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520, [2010] HCA 45 Hughes v R (2008) 185 A Crim R 155, [2008] NSWCCA 48 Primmer v R [2015] NSWCCA 155 R v AB [2011] NSWCCA 229 R v AB (No 2) [2011] NSWCCA 256 R v Janceski [2005] NSWCCA 288 R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209 R v Price [2016] NSWCCA 50 R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252, [2002] NSWCCA 343 Stanyard v R [2013] NSWCCA 134 Thomson and Houlton v R (2000) 49 NSWLR 383, [2000] NSWCCA 309 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Marco Paulo Silvestri - Applicant Regina - Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr P Boulton SC - Applicant Ms N Williams - Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate