NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rolleston v Insurance Australia Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1561 Hearing dates: 17 and 18 October 2016 Date of orders: 04 November 2016 Decision date: 04 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: McDougall J Decision: Verdict for plaintiff for $991,946 with interest. Parties to bring in agreed calculation of interest. Reserve costs. Catchwords: INSURANCE – fraudulent claim – whether insurance claim for house fire was made fraudulently – whether the plaintiff, or someone with his connivance, started the fire – whether defendant knowingly made false representations to insurer or its agents – where the defendant must prove that the claim is fraudulent on the balance of probabilities – Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth), s 56 EVIDENCE – admissibility – expert evidence – whether conclusions reached based on specialised knowledge – whether expert's reasoning process disclosed - where to admit report into evidence would result in prejudice to the defendant – Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 79, 135 Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) Cases Cited: Arcus Shopfitters Pty Ltd v Western Australian Planning Commission [2002] WASC 174 Bone v Wallalong Investments [2012] NSWSC 137 Brewarrana Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Highways (1973) 6 SASR 541 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Manifest Shipping Co Ltd v Uni-Polaris Insurance Co Ltd [2003] 1 AC 469 Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 67 ALJR 170 Rejfek v McElroy (1965) 112 CLR 517 Sgro v Australian Associated Motor Insurers Ltd (2015) 91 NSWLR 325 To v Australian Associated Motor Insurers Ltd (2001) 3 VR 279 Transport Industries Insurance Co Ltd v Longmuir [1997] 1 VR 125 Walton v Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd [2004] NSWSC 616 Western Australian Planning Commission v Arcus Shopfitters Pty Ltd [2003] WASCA 295 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Phillip Rolleston (Plaintiff) Insurance Australia Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Greinke / W Wild (Plaintiff) G Carolan (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate