NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Parramatta v Doepel [2016] NSWSC 1566 Hearing dates: 3 November 2016 Date of orders: 03 November 2016 Decision date: 03 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: (1) The plaintiffs prepare calculations of a judgment sum in accordance with these reasons.
(2) The proceedings stand over to 10am on 4 November 2016 for the entry of judgment. Catchwords: FIDUCIARY – bribes allegedly paid to senior IT manager – nature of bribe and remedies available at common law – ex parte hearing – payment of bribe established – demonstration of loss caused by receipt of bribe – overcharging by supplier – fiduciary deliberately failed to scrutinise accounts – overcharging established – interest – set off of settlement funds. Legislation Cited: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) Roman Catholic Church Trust Property Act 1936 (NSW) Cases Cited: Aequitas v AEFC [2001] NSWSC 14 Attorney General for Hong Kong v Reid [1994] 1 AC 324 Banque Commerciale SA v Akhill Holdings Ltd [1990] HCA 11; (1990) 169 CLR 271 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 396 Grimaldi v Chameleon Mining NL (No 2) [2012] 200 FCR 296 Hovenden & Sons v Millhoff (1900) 83 LT 41 Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v CTC Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 58 T Mahesan s/o Thambiah v The Malaysia Government Officers' Co-operative Housing Society Ltd (Malaysia) [1979] AC 374 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Trustee of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Parramatta (Plaintiff) Matthew Gill Doepel (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: SA Lawrance; AR Jordan (Plaintiff) No Appearance (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate