NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Younan v R [2016] NSWCCA 248 Hearing dates: 6 May 2016 Decision date: 09 November 2016 Before: Beazley P at [1]; R A Hulme J at [184]; R S Hulme AJ at [185] Decision: (1) Appeal against conviction dismissed;
(2) Leave to appeal against sentence granted;
(3) Appeal against sentence dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – where trial judge refused to discharge jury – where witness alleged to have made prejudicial statements – whether any prejudice could be remedied by directions CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – substantial miscarriage of justice – whether conduct of Crown case led to a miscarriage of justice – whether trial counsel had provided incompetent representation – whether the appellant was pressured into signing a statement of agreed facts CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence - whether sentence manifestly excessive – whether trial judge erred in considering the appellant's age – whether the trial judge erred in making a finding of special circumstances – whether conduct of trial led errors in the sentencing process – re-exercise of sentencing discretion on appeal Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Cases Cited: Bland v R (2014) 241 A Crim R 51; [2014] NSWCCA 82 Bugmy v The Queen (1990) 169 CLR 525; [1990] HCA 18 Crofts v The Queen (1996) 186 CLR 427; [1996] HCA 22 Flaherty v R; R v Flaherty [2016] NSWCCA 188 Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 KT v R (2008) 182 A Crim R 571; [2008] NSWCCA 51 Loury v R [2010] NSWCCA 158 Miller v R [2015] NSWCCA 206 MS2 v The Queen (2005) 158 A Crim R 93; [2005] NSWCCA 397 Nudd v The Queen (2006) 80 ALJR 614; [2006] HCA 9 Qing An v R [2007] NSWCCA 53 R v Ahola (No 6) [2013] NSWSC 703 R v Bartle [2003] NSWCCA 329 R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 R v Hearne (2001) 124 A Crim R 451; [2001] NSWCCA 37 R v Ly [2014] NSWCCA 78 R v Marsland (NSWCCA, 17 July 1991, unreported) R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 702; [2001] NSWCCA 534 Santo v R [2009] NSWCCA 269 Tsiakas v R [2015] NSWCCA 187 Wong v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (2005) 155 A Crim R 37 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Raymond Younan (Appellant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Provera (Appellant) K Ginges (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate