NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sutton v R [2016] NSWCCA 249 Hearing dates: 26 October 2016 Decision date: 09 November 2016 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Fagan J at [65]; N Adams J at [66] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – where aggregate sentence imposed for offences of knowingly taking part in drug supply and possession of firearm – Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) s 7(1) – plea of guilty – where guilt admitted to Form 1 offences – possession of ammunition without permit, possession of unregistered firearm and possession of prohibited weapon (silencer) – appeal against severity of sentence – where at relevant time applicable standard non-parole period for firearms offence was three years – where standard non-parole period misstated by primary judge as four years – Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 6(3) – whether error requires re-exercise of sentencing discretion – whether finding of special circumstances should be made on basis of ill-health – gallstones – objective seriousness – where offences committed whilst on parole for armed robbery conviction – where primary judge found another person left revolver at applicant's home and no evidence of use or intended use by applicant – where pistol found with silencer and ammunition – where history of firearms and possession of prohibited weapon offences Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 61N Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 6 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 32, 44, 53A, 54B Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Firearms Offences) Act 2015 (NSW) Sch 1 Pt 5 Drug (Misuse and Trafficking) Act 1985 (NSW) s 25 Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) ss 4C, 7, 36, 65 Cases Cited: AB v R [2014] NSWCCA 31 Abbas v R [2014] NSWCCA 188 Anastasiou v R [2010] NSWCCA 100 Baxter v The Queen (2007) 173 A Crim R 284; [2007] NSWCCA 237 Douar v R (2005) 159 A Crim R 154; [2005] NSWCCA 455 House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Leighton v R [2010] NSWCCA 280 Martin v R [2016] NSWCCA 104 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 R v Badanjak [2004] NSWCCA 395 R v Brown [2006] NSWCCA 249 R v Farrell [2015] NSWCCA 68 R v Howard [2004] NSWCCA 348 R v Mahmud [2010] NSWCCA 219 R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 R v Smith (1987) 44 SASR 587 R v XX [2009] NSWCCA 115 Thalari v R [2009] NSWCCA 170 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Applicant – Anthony Graham Sutton Crown Respondent – Director of Public Prosecutions Representation: Counsel: Applicant – Mr C Taylor Crown Respondent – E. Balodis
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate