NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Dashti [2016] NSWCCA 251 Hearing dates: 8 June 2016 Decision date: 10 November 2016 Before: Beazley P; Garling J; Fagan J Decision: (1) Allow the appeal;
(2) Quash the sentence imposed on Mr Dashti on 4 December 2015 and in its place impose an aggregate sentence of imprisonment comprising of a non-parole period of 21 years 6 months to commence on 9 February 2012 and to expire on 8 August 2033, with a balance of term of 7 years and 2 months to commence on 9 August 2033 and expire on 8 October 2040. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence under the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5D – respondent pleaded guilty to drug offences – whether sentencing discretion miscarried – whether sentencing judge failed to take into account legislative guidelines – whether sentencing judge erred in finding special circumstances – whether sentence manifestly inadequate Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Cases Cited: Abdulrahman v R [2016] NSWCCA 192 AC v R [2016] NSWCCA 107 Alrubae v R [2016] NSWCCA 142 Attorney General's Application Under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 [2002] NSWCCA 518; 56 NSWLR 146 Barbaro v The Queen [2010] VSCA 288; 226 A Crim R 354 Barbaro v The Queen [2014] HCA 2; 253 CLR 58 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41 Collier v R [2012] NSWCCA 213 Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 Greenaway v R [2013] NSWCCA 270 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Jimmy v The Queen [2010] NSWCCA 60; 77 NSWLR 540 Lacey v Attorney-General (Qld) [2011] HCA 10; 243 CLR 573 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA R v Hallocoglu (1992) 29 NSWLR 67 R v Harris [2015] NSWCCA 81 R v Latouff (unreported, NSWCCA, 12 December 1996) R v Nykolyn [2012] NSWCCA 219 R v Ohar [2004] NSWCCA 83; 59 NSWLR 596 R v Shepherd [2003] NSWCCA 287; 142 A Crim R 101 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; 53 NSWLR 704 R v Van Ryn [2016] NSWCCA 1 R v Wood [2014] NSWCCA 184; 244 A Crim R 501 Vigo v R [2009] NSWCCA 98 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44; 223 A Crim R 460 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Appellant) Mohammad Dashti (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: V Lydiard (Appellant) G Brady SC; A Cook (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate