NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Khorramdel v RG Macaulay and A Saivanidis trading as Pryor Tzannes & Wallis Solicitors [2016] NSWDC 293 Hearing dates: 4 November 2016 Date of orders: 08 November 2016 Decision date: 08 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) Summons dismissed. (2) Plaintiff pay defendant's costs. (3) Liberty to restore in relation to costs, such liberty to be exercised by Friday 2 December 2016. (4) Exhibits retained for 28 days. Catchwords: COSTS – costs appeal under s 384 Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) – plaintiff appeals Review Panel determination dismissing all but one of his claims – whether Review Panel erred in determining that the costs assessor had not denied the plaintiff procedural fairness – whether Review Panel erred in determination of costs of the costs assessor and the Panel – no issue of principle Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), ss 302, 309, 322, 328, 329, 359, 367, 368, 369, 379, 381, 384 and 385 Cases Cited: B & L Linings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2008) 74 NSWLR 481 Bechara trading as Bechara and Company v Bates [2016] NSWCA 294 Bellevarde Constructions Pty Ltd v CPC Energy Pty Ltd (2011) 12 DCLR (NSW) 304 CSR Ltd v Eddy (2008) 70 NSWLR 725 eInduct Systems Pty Ltd v 3D Safety Services Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 284 Gorczynski v AWM Dickinson & Son [2005] NSWSC 277 Khorramdel v Macaulay and Saivanidis trading as Prior Tzannes & Wallis (NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal, 15 December 2015, P Boyce Senior Member) Khorramdel and Secretary, Department of Social Services [2015] AATA 383 Lang v Kirkness (New South Wales Supreme Court, Harrison M, 22 October 1997) London Scottish Benefit Society v Chorley, Crawford and Chester (1884) 13 QBD 872 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Siavash Khorramdel Defendant: RG Macaulay and A Saivanidis trading as Pryor Tzannes & Wallis Solicitors Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: In person Defendant: Mr P Crane (solicitor)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate