NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Optimisation Australia Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1581 Hearing dates: Wednesday, 9 March 2016 Date of orders: 09 March 2016 Decision date: 09 March 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Brereton J Decision: Documents admitted Catchwords: EVIDENCE – privilege – client legal privilege – whether defendants were the clients entitled to claim privilege – where chain of emails sent from company computer with official company signature used – where action which advice sought could only be taken by company, not individuals – held, defendants were the clients
EVIDENCE – privilege – client legal privilege – whether privilege had been lost – whether secondary evidence can be given by tender of emails – common law position would admit evidence regardless of any waiver – (NSW) Evidence Act 1995, s 118 and s 119 overturns common law position so that secondary evidence is not admissible – whether defendants have waived privilege under Evidence Act, s 122(2) – held, privilege was waived by delay Legislation Cited: (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, s 232 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995, s 117, s 118, s 119 Cases Cited: Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd v Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 439, (2012) 295 ALR 348 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Lindberg (2009) 25 VR 398 Bell v David Jones Ltd (1948) 49 SR(NSW) 223 Calcraft v Guest [1898] 1 QB 759 Edman v Ross (1922) 22 SR(NSW) 351 Goddard v Nationwide Building Society [1987] 1 QB 760 Hodgson v Amcor Limited [2011] VSC 269, (2011) 32 VR 568 Lloyd v Mostyn (1842) 10 M&W 478; (1842) 152 ER 558 Lord Ashburton v Pape [1913] 2 Ch 469 Nolan v Nolan [2013] QSC 140 Norman v O'Mahony [2006] FCA 1169 Shepherd v Fox Williams LLP [2014] EWHC 1224 Spedley Securities Ltd v Bank of New Zealand (1991) 26 NSWLR 711 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Brian Raymond Kearney (first plaintiff) Optimisation Australia Pty Ltd (first defendant) Gary Williams (second defendant) Susan Elizabeth Williams (third defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Fernon (plaintiff) M P Cleary (defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate