NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Gondon Five Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1584 Hearing dates: Tuesday, 18 October 2016 Date of orders: 18 October 2016 Decision date: 18 October 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Brereton J Decision: Refer para [16] Catchwords: EQUITY – equitable remedies – injunctions – where previous orders contained no express carve-out for reasonable legal expenses – significant legal costs incurred at early stage and now additional proceedings brought – general proposition freezing order should not prevent payment of legal costs and expenses reasonably incurred – does not mean express carve-out for legal costs required if practical effect of order is not to prevent payment – proposition at strongest where freezing order granted in aid of claim for unsecured debt or damages – previous judgment made clear that carve-out not required – structure of parties involved in proceedings are such that two-thirds of what trustee of trust receives will be available for distribution Legislation Cited: (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, s 237 Cases Cited: In the matter of Gondon Five Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1401 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Tracy Xiaowen Cui (plaintiff) Cui Family Asset Management Pty Limited (first defendant) Gondon Five Pty Limited (second defendant) Jinsong Cui (third defendant) Arise Constructions Pty Limited (fourth defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Clark (plaintiff) L Chapman (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate