NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Re Amazon Pest Control Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1590 Hearing dates: In chambers on the papers Date of orders: 10 November 2016 Decision date: 10 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Young AJ Decision: Amend order 1(a) to $1,069,125.73, order 1(b) to $488,916.48 and the last line of order 2 to "The final judgment sum is thus $1,558,042.21". Catchwords: PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – slip rule – application to reduce judgment sum because of mistake in calculation – defendant became bankrupt after judgment pronounced – whether jurisdiction to make the amendment
BANKRUPTCY – application to reduce judgment amount under slip rule – order made before bankruptcy – application under slip rule after bankruptcy – whether prohibited fresh step in proceeding – Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 58(3) Legislation Cited: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Cases Cited: ANZ Banking Group v Computer Plus [1992] 1 VR 607 Australian Broadcasting Commission v Industrial Court (SA) (1985) 159 CLR 536; [1985] HCA 71 Deighton v Cockle [1912] 1 KB 206 Doran v Isaacs (1912) 12 SR (NSW) 699 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: 2015/87126 Plaintiff: Edward Ted Lakis Defendant 1: Michael Victor Lardis Defendant 2: PestHelp Holdings Pty Ltd
2015/89913 Plaintiff: Michael Victor Lardis Defendant: Edward Ted Lakis Representation: Websters (for ET Lakis) David Leamey Solicitor & Barrister (for MV Lardis and PestHelp Holdings Pty Ltd) File Number(s): 2015/87126; 2015/89913
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate