NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Brookes (Preliminary) [2016] NSWSC 1593 Hearing dates: 10 November 2016 Decision date: 10 November 2016 Before: R A Hulme J Decision: Interim supervision order for 28 days with two qualified psychiatrists appointed to conduct separate psychiatric examinations of the defendant Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDER – sex offender – preliminary hearing – application for interim supervision order – Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) – application not opposed – order made Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000 (NSW) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) ss 7(4), 10A Cases Cited: State of New South Wales v Brookes [2008] NSWSC 150 State of New South Wales v Brookes [2008] NSWSC 473 State of New South Wales v Brookes [2008] NSWCA 212 State of New South Wales v Brookes (Supreme Court (NSW), Barr AJ, 16 April 2010, unrep) State of NSW v Brookes [2010] NSWSC 728 State of New South Wales v Brookes (Supreme Court (NSW), Hidden J, 15 September 2011, unrep) State of NSW v Brookes (Supreme Court (NSW), Hidden J, 12 December 2011, unrep) Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Alexandria George Brookes (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Aitken (Plaintiff) Mr M Johnston SC (Defendant)
Solicitors: Crown Solicitors Legal Aid NSW File Number(s): 2016/307034
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate