NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Smeaton Grange Holdings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2016] NSWSC 1594 Hearing dates: 4 November 2015 Decision date: 15 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Revenue List Before: White J Decision: Refer to paras [109] and [110] of judgment. Catchwords: TAX — payroll tax — businesses grouped for payroll tax purposes by operation of subs 106I(6) of the Taxation Administration Act 1996 and s 72(6) of the Payroll Tax Act 2007 — person with controlling interest in grouped businesses who could benefit from discretionary trusts as a result of the trustees exercising some power or discretion disclaimed his right as a discretionary object on becoming aware of the grouping — whether the disclaimer meant that subs 106I(6) of the Taxation Administration Act 1996 and s 72(6) of the Payroll Tax Act 2007 had no application for the tax years in question — whether a person who may benefit from a discretionary trust as a result of the trustee exercising some power or discretion may disclaim their right as a discretionary object — held they can — whether a person who may benefit from a discretionary trust as a result of the trustee exercising some power or discretion may disclaim their right as a discretionary object in the absence of valuable consideration — held they can — whether the disclaimer of a person who may benefit from a discretionary trust as a result of the trustee exercising some power or discretion operates retrospectively — held it does — notices of assessment revoked Legislation Cited: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Finance Act 1940 (UK) Pay-roll Tax Act 1971 (NSW) Payroll Tax Act 2007 (NSW) Taxation Administration Act 1996 (NSW) Taxation Administration Act 1999 (ACT) Cases Cited: Banque Nationale de Paris v Falkirk Developments Ltd (1977) 136 CLR 177 Burns Philp Hardware Ltd v Howard Chia Pty Ltd (1986) 8 NSWLR 621 Burns Philp Hardware Ltd v Howard Chia Pty Ltd (1987) 8 NSWLR 642 Cronulla Sutherland Leagues Club Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1990) 23 FCR 82 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Cornell (1946) 73 CLR 394 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Ramsden [2005] FCAFC 39; (2005) 58 ATR 485 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Word Investments Ltd (2008) 236 CLR 204; [2008] HCA 55 Hardoon v Belilios [1901] AC 118 HJA Holdings Pty Ltd v ACT Revenue Office [2011] ACAT 91 Howard F Hudson Pty Ltd v Ronayne (1972) 126 CLR 449 In re Gulbenkian's Settlements (No. 2) [1970] Ch 408 In re Stratton's Disclaimer [1958] Ch 42 JW Broomhead (Vic) Pty Ltd (in liq) v JW Broomhead Pty Ltd [1985] VR 891 Kennon v Spry (2008) 238 CLR 366; [2008] HCA 56 Lady Naas v Westminster Bank Limited [1940] AC 366 Lewis v Lohse [2003] QCA 199 Mallott v Wilson [1903] 2 Ch 494 Marshin Holdings Pty Ltd v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2013] NSWSC 326 Mirzikinian v Tom & Bill Waterhouse Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 296 Rann v Hughes (1778) 7 Term Rep 350n; 101 ER 1014n Re Cranstoun [1949] 1 Ch 523 Re Hayes Settlement Trusts [1982] 1 WLR 202 Re Manisty's Settlement [1974] Ch 17 Re Paradise Motor Co Ltd [1968] 1 WLR 1125 Tantau v MacFarlane [2010] NSWSC 224 Townson v Tickell (1819) 3 B & Ald 31; 106 ER 575 Texts Cited: Crago, "Principles of Disclaimer of Gifts" (1999) 28 Western Australian Law Review 65 Hardingham & Baxt, Discretionary Trusts (2nd ed, 1984, Butterworths) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Smeaton Grange Holdings Pty Ltd (1st Plaintiff) Tri-City Smash Repairs Pty Ltd (2nd Plaintiff) Ifould Holdings Pty Ltd (3rd Plaintiff) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: I Young (Plaintiffs) J Needham SC with S Kaur-Bains (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate