NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Safe Work (NSW) v Tamex Transport Services P/L t/as Tamex [2016] NSWDC 295 Hearing dates: 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 October 2016 Date of orders: 11 November 2016 Decision date: 11 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Judge AC Scotting Decision: 1. The elements of the offence have been proved beyond reasonable doubt. 2. I find the defendant guilty of the offence. 3. I will list the matter for a sentence hearing at a date convenient to the parties. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – trial- plea of not guilty- prosecution – work health and safety – duty of persons undertaking business – duty of employers – risk of death or serious injury – serious injury to employee – offence – not guilty – labour hire – labour hire worker – supervision – safe work method statement PROCEDURAL – charge particularised – amendment – proof of elements of charge – burden of proof – proof beyond reasonable doubt - onus WORK HEALTH AND SAFETY – safe work system –– employee training – previous compliance notices – duty Legislation Cited: Work Health and Safety Act 2011 ss 12A, 19(1), 19(3), 32 Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 s 8(2) Cases Cited: Laing O'Rourke (BMC) Pty Ltd v Kirwin [2011] WASCA 117 Slivak v Lurgi (Aust) Pty Ltd (2001) 205 CLR 304 Tangerine Confectionery Ltd and Veolia ES (UK) Ltd v R [2011] EWCA Crim 2015 Thiess Pty Ltd v Industrial Court of New South Wales (2010) 78 NSWLR 94 Genner Constructions Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [2001] NSWIRComm 267 Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd v R (2012) 246 CLR 92 WorkCover Authority of New South Wales v Kellogg (Aust) Pty Ltd [1999] NSWIRComm 453 Dunlop Rubber Australia Ltd v Buckley (1952) 87 CLR 313 at 320 Smith v Broken Hill Pty Ltd (1957) 97 CLR 337 WorkCover Authority of New South Wales v Kirk Group Holdings Pty Ltd (2004) 135 IR 166 Collins v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1986) 5 NSWLR 209 Bulga Underground Operations v Nash [2016] NSWCCA 37 Royall v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 378 Simpson Design and Associates Pty Ltd v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 316 Mahmood v State of Western Australia (2008) 232 CLR 397 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Safe Work (NSW) (Prosecutor) Tamex Transport Services P/L t/as Tamex (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr Magee (Prosecutor) Mr Ranken (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate