NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Cao v Yu & Anor [2016] NSWDC 296 Hearing dates: 26 September 2016 Date of orders: 14 November 2016 Decision date: 14 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Judge Levy SC Decision: 1. The notice of motion filed by the second defendant applicant on 26 August 2016, as amended, seeking dismissal or alternatively striking out of the proceedings, pursuant to UCPR r 13.4 and r 14.28, is dismissed;
2. The second defendant applicant is to pay the plaintiff respondent's costs of the dismissed motion;
3. Liberty to apply on 7 days' notice if further or other orders are required;
4. The proceedings are listed before the List Judge for case management directions at 10.00am on Monday 28 November 2016. Catchwords: PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – applications for dismissal pursuant to UCPR r 13.4 and for strike out pursuant to UCPR r 14.28 Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 13.4, r 14.28 Cases Cited: Cao v Liu, 2012/275052, District Court, unreported, 6 September 2013 Habib v Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 231 Yu v Cao [2015] NSWCA 276 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Ping Cao (Plaintiff/Respondent) Barrie Goldsmith t/as Goldsmith Lawyers (First defendant) George Yu (Second defendant/Applicant) Representation: Counsel: Mr KP Smark SC (Plaintiff/Respondent) Mr R Rasmussen (Second defendant/Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate