NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: OGC v R [2016] NSWCCA 254 Hearing dates: 5 October 2016 Date of orders: 21 November 2016 Decision date: 21 November 2016 Before: Ward JA at [1]; Harrison J at [2]; R A Hulme J at [40] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal against sentence. (2) Refuse leave to adduce evidence in the appeal. (3) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: APPEAL – sentence – appeal against sentence – whether manifestly excessive – whether sentencing judge failed to have proper regard for offender's remorse and contrition – assistance – whether a miscarriage of justice occurred by reason of a failure to adduce evidence of assistance – whether evidence would have led to a different sentencing outcome
EVIDENCE – application for leave to adduce evidence on appeal – where a forensic decision made in court below not to call evidence of assistance – whether miscarriage of justice Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Firearms Act 1996 Cases Cited: Cornwell v R [2015] NSWCCA 269 Khoury v R (2011) 209 A Crim R 509; [2011] NSWCCA 118 R v Abou-Chabake (2004) 149 A Crim R 417 R v Fordham (1997) 98 A Crim R 359 R v Goodwin (1990) 51 A Crim R 328 R v Thomas [2007] NSWCCA 269 Category: Principal judgment Parties: OGC (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Brezniak (Applicant) N Williams (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate