NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tanious v NSW Land and Housing Corporation [2016] NSWCATAP 246 Hearing dates: 24 October 2016 Date of orders: 15 November 2016 Decision date: 15 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: Wright J, President Emeritus Prof G de Q Walker, Senior Member Decision: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) Leave to appeal is refused. Catchwords: RESIDENTIAL TENANCY – appeal from order to remove metal coverings from windows under s 187 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 – whether right to quiet enjoyment entitled tenant to install metal coverings without prior written permission – tenant not entitled to install metal coverings
RESIDENTIAL TENANCY – whether Tribunal erred in law by relying on inadmissible or otherwise inappropriate evidence – Tribunal not bound by Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 – Tribunal not bound by rules of evidence in these proceedings – no error in Tribunal's approach to evidence demonstrated Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Allen v TriCare (Hastings) Ltd [2016] NSWCATAP 216 Hancock v East Coast Timber Products Pty Limited [2011] NSWCA 11 Martins Camera Corner Pty Ltd v Hotel Mayfair Ltd [1976] 2 NSWLR 15 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Mofeed Louis Tanious (appellant) NSW Land and Housing Corporation (respondent) Representation: The appellant in person Mr C McMeniman, of counsel, for the respondent File Number(s): AP 16/37819 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Date of Decision: 10 August 2016 Before: G Sarginson, General Member File Number(s): SH 16/25006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate