NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hansell v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2016] NSWCA 311 Hearing dates: 15 November 2016 Decision date: 15 November 2016 Before: Beazley P; Basten JA; Leeming JA Decision: 1. An order quashing the judgment of the District Court given on 1 April 2016. 2. An order that the District Court, constituted by a different judge, determine the plaintiff's appeal according to law. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – appeal to District Court against Local Court conviction – District Court judge dismissed appeal but relied on video files included in material tendered but which were not in evidence in Local Court – neither party directed judge's attention to additional video files – breach of procedural fairness conceded – District Court decision quashed and matter remitted
COSTS – successful applicant's costs – whether costs should follow event – where applicant's success only partial – where respondent made prompt concessions – where both parties contributed to error in court below – no order as to costs Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 91K(1), 91K(3) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 18(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 12 District Court Act 1973 (NSW), ss 127, 176 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Cases Cited: Bandara v Director of Public Prosecutions [2016] NSWCA 140 Muldoon v Church of England Children's Homes Burwood (2011) 80 NSWLR 282; [2011] NSWCA 46 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Adam Geoffrey Hansell (Plaintiff) Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (First Defendant) District Court of New South Wales (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: S Boland (Plaintiff) D Kell SC, M Pulsford (First Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate