NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lehn v R [2016] NSWCCA 255 Hearing dates: 20 May 2016 Date of orders: 18 November 2016 Decision date: 18 November 2016 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Beazley P at [118]; R A Hulme J at [119]; Schmidt J at [128]; Wilson J at [130] Decision: Grant the applicant leave to appeal. Appeal allowed. Quash the sentence imposed on the applicant on 4 March 2015 and in lieu thereof impose the following sentence: For the offence of stealing a motor vehicle contrary to s 154F of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), a fixed term of imprisonment of 1 year and 9 months to date from 10 June 2013 and expire on 9 March 2015. For the offence of aggravated dangerous driving causing death contrary to s 52A of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), a non-parole period of 5 years commencing on 10 December 2013 with a balance of term of 3 years and 3 months expiring on 9 March 2022. The earliest date the applicant will be eligible for release to parole is 9 December 2018. Order that the appellant be disqualified from holding a driver's licence pursuant to s 205(2)(d)(ii) and s 206A(3) of the Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW) for a period of 2 years. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – sentencing – where error in according procedural fairness as to extent of discount applied for guilty plea – whether appellate court must re-exercise sentencing discretion generally or only in respect of discrete component affected by error – whether manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 9, 22, 33, 44 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 52A, 52AB, 154F Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 10 Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW), s 206A Cases Cited: Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (2009) 239 CLR 27; [2009] HCA 41 Alpha v R [2015] NSWCCA 225 Application by Darush Majid pursuant to Part 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) [2016] NSWSC 561 Arsiotis v R [2015] NSWCCA 275 Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; [2002] NSWCCA 518 Baxter v R [2007] NSWCCA 237; (2007) 173 A Crim R 284 Bombardieri v R [2010] NSWCCA 161; (2010) 203 A Crim R 89 Carroll v R [2015] NSWCCA 219 Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v Consolidated Media Holdings Ltd (2012) 250 CLR 503; [2012] HCA 55 Daniels v R [2016] NSWCCA 35 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Haines v R [2016] NSWCCA 90 Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Hutchen v R [2015] NSWCCA 101 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Kentwell v R (No 2) [2015] NSWCCA 96 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Marrow v R [2015] NSWCCA 282 Martin v R [2016] NSWCCA 104 MD v R [2015] NSWCCA 37 O'Connell v R [2016] NSWCCA 43 O'Grady v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 621; [2014] HCA 38 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610; [1998] HCA 57 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704; [2001] NSWCCA 534 R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; [2000] NSWCCA 309 R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252; [2002] NSWCCA 343 R v Wright [2013] NSWCCA 82; (2013) 229 A Crim R 245 Ravenor Overseas Inc v Readhead (1998) 72 ALJR 671; [1998] HCA 17 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Miah (2001) 206 CLR 57; [2001] HCA 22 Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82; [2000] HCA 57 Smith v R [2011] NSWCCA 290 Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141; [1986] HCA 54 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Matthew Lehn (Applicant) Representation: Counsel: T Game SC (Applicant) (written submissions) W Hunt (Applicant) P Ingram SC (Respondent) N Adams (Respondent) (written submissions)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate