NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kang v Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd [2016] NSWDC 307 Hearing dates: 10 November 2016 Date of orders: 15 November 2016 Decision date: 15 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) Plaintiff's Notice of Motion filed in court on 10 November 2016 dismissed. (2) Defendants' Notices of Motion of 29 July 2016, 25 August 2016 and 30 August 2016 granted; these proceedings are struck out and dismissed. (3) The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs of these proceedings. (4) Liberty to apply concerning costs. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – delay in commencement and conduct of litigation – plaintiff commences defamation proceedings against seven defendants but fails to serve the defendants before the first return date – substantial pleading errors in statement of claim remain unrectified despite leave to amend being granted and, when those orders were not complied with, costs orders being made – defendants bring applications for summary dismissal and to set aside the claims made against the unserved parties – belated application by plaintiff for extension of time to serve the statement of claim and for leave to amend – proposed amended statement of claim still defective – whether proceedings should be summarily dismissed under UCPR r 12.7 and s 61 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) – whether unserved parties entitled to a declaration that the statement of claim had not been served and an order that the statement of claim be set aside under UCPR r 12.11(1)(c) – unsatisfactory explanations by plaintiffs for delay, failure to serve and failure to comply with orders – orders sought by defendants made Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56 – 62 and 67 Defamation Act 1974 (NSW), s 9(3) Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), s 23 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 6.2, 10.20, 12.7, 12.11 and 18.5 Cases Cited: Alex v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2015] NSWDC 78 Campbell v Regional Publishers Pty Ltd (Supreme Court of NSW, 30 October 1998) Crux - Southern Cross University Post Graduate Association Inc v Watts [2013] NSWDC 254 Duke of Brunswick v Harmer (1849) 14 QB 185 Foley v Rosier [2014] NSWDC 92 Ghosh v Ninemsn Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 334 Habib v Radio 2UE Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 231 Hanson v Hunter [2015] NSWDC 220 Hunter v Hanson [2014] NSWCA 263 Hunter v Hanson [2015] HCATrans 16 Kang v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2015] NSWCA 376 Kang v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2015] NSWSC 893 Kang v Immigration News Pty Ltd [2016] NSWDC 74 McCarey v Associated Newspapers Ltd [1965] 2 QB 86 Smith v Grant (2006) 67 NSWLR 735 SZWCA v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 1249 Weston v Publishing and Broadcasting Ltd [2012] NSWCA 79 White v Sparks [2015] NSWDC 53 Texts Cited: J.D. Evans, "Seizure of a Member's document under search warrant", The Table, Vol 72, 2004 Report of Standing Committee on Parliamentary Privilege and Ethics (Report 23 – December 2003), Legislative Council of New South Wales Spencer Bower, "A Code of the Law of Actionable Defamation", 2nd ed (1923) Butterworth & Co Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Plaintiff: Edward (Eddie) Kang First Defendant: Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd (ACN 000 145 246) Second Defendant: Helen Wellings Third Defendant: State of New South Wales Fourth Defendant: The Hon. Matthew Ryan Mason-Cox Fifth Defendant: David Byrne, Department of Fair Trading Sixth Defendant: Nationwide News Pty Ltd Seventh Defendant: Jay Bishop, Department of Fair Trading Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: Mr R Rasmussen First and Second Defendants: Mr R Jedrzejczyk Third, Fourth, Fifth and Seventh Defendant: Mr B Watts (solicitor) Sixth Defendant: Ms L E Barnett
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate