NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: SG v New South Wales Crime Commission [2016] NSWSC 1615 Hearing dates: 8, 26 April 2016 Date of orders: 17 November 2016 Decision date: 17 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) Motion to dismiss the proceedings dismissed; (2) Legal professional privilege available for some documents in accordance with the reasons for judgment; (3) Detailed directions on the availability of legal professional privilege to be subject to further submissions and inspection by the Court. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – power of NSW Crime Commission and effect of statutory secrecy provisions discussed. STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION – the scheme and purposes of the Crime Commission Act 2012 – the interpretation of the secrecy provisions. LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE – some documents created as a result of illegality – privilege does not apply – but illegality limited and some documents (or parts of documents) privileged. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – abuse of process on account of illegality underpinning commencement of proceedings – discussion – motion to dismiss refused. Legislation Cited: Constitution Crime Commission Act 2012 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 Evidence Act 1995 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Agar v Hyde [2000] HCA 41; (2004) 201 CLR 552 Amcor Limited and Ors v Barnes and Ors [2011] VSC 341 Attorney-General (NT) v Kearney [1985] HCA 60; (1985) 158 CLR 500 Bullivant v Attorney-General for Victoria [1901] AC 196 Dubai Aluminium Co Ltd v Al Alawi and Ors [1999] 1 WLR 1964 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) [1964] HCA 69; (1964) 112 CLR 125 Imerman v Tchenguiz and Ors; Imerman v Imerman [2011] 2 WLR 592 Kang v Kwan [2001] NSWSC 698 Kuwait Airways Corpn v Iraqi Airways Co (No 6) [2005] 1 WLR 2734 Memory Corporation Plc and Anor v Sidhu and Anor (No 2) [2000] 1 WLR 1443 Moschi v Lep Air Services Ltd; Lep Air Services Ltd v Rolloswin [1973] AC 331 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; 194 CLR 355 R v Cox and Railton (1884) 14 Q.B.D. 153 Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia [2010] HCA 28; (2010) 241 CLR 118 Category: Principal judgment Parties: SG (Plaintiff) New South Wales Crime Commission (First Defendant) State of New South Wales (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: TGR Parker SC and S Hartford Davis (Plaintiff) NJ Williams SC and B Mostafa (First Defendant) K Richardson (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate