NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Courtatos t/as Surf City Motors v Willis [2016] NSWCATAP 249 Hearing dates: 27 July 2016 and 29 September 2016 Date of orders: 17 November 2016 Decision date: 17 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: M Harrowell, Principal Member G Walker, Senior Member Decision: 1. The appeal is dismissed and leave to appeal is refused. 2. The appellant is to pay the respondent the sum of $825.00 being the costs thrown away in respect of the adjourned hearing on 27 July 2016, such amount to be paid immediately. Catchwords: Procedural fairness- failure to allow adjournment, inadequate reasons. Australian Consumer Law (NSW)- major defect, obligation to return goods unless significant cost. Evidence of defects- absence of opposing evidence, form of evidence Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Cases Cited: Brodyn Pty Ltd v Owners Corporation – Strata Plan 73019 (No 2) [2016] NSWCATAP 224 Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1 Italiano v Carbone & Ors [2005] NSWCA 177 Khan v Kang [2014] NSWCATAP 48 Megerditchian v Kurmond Homes Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 120 Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; (1996) 185 CLR 259 Category: Principal judgment Parties: George Couratos t/as Surf City Motors (Appellant) Sally Willis (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Strain (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate