NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Baker v NSW Land and Housing Corporation [2016] NSWCATAP 251 Hearing dates: 2 August 2016 Date of orders: 18 November 2016 Decision date: 18 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: L P Robberds QC Senior Member Dr J Lucy Senior Member Decision: (1) Leave to appeal refused (2) Appeal dismissed Catchwords: Social housing tenancy agreement – breaches of agreement – whether sufficient to justify termination of agreement – consideration of s87 Residential Tenancies Act – amendment of that Act – whether Tribunal took into account relevant provisions in s152 of that Act - whether adequate reasons given by Tribunal for termination –whether Tribunal failed to take into account respondent's hoarding policy – whether appellant may have suffered a substantial miscarriage of justice. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Residential Tenancies Act 2010 Residential Tenancies and Housing Legislation Amendment (Public Housing – Antisocial Behaviour) Act 2015 Cases Cited: Azariel v NSW Land & Housing Corporation [2006] NSWCA 372 Director General Department of Finance & Services v Porter [2014] NSWCATAP 6 Linfox Australia Pty Ltd v Fair Work Commission [2013] FCAFC 157 Reece v Webber [2011] FCAFC 33 at [67]; 192 FCR 254 Steed v Minister for Immigration (1981) 37 ALR 620 WAEE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184 at [46], 75 ALD 630 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hassan Baker (Appellant) NSW Land and Housing Corporation (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Liedermann (Appellant) B Anniwell (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate