NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: MyPet Brands Pty Ltd v Beonic Technologies Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1628 Hearing dates: 14 November 2016 Decision date: 18 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Stevenson J Decision: Statement of claim struck out; plaintiff given leave to re-plead; subpoenas set aside Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – pleadings – whether proceedings should be dismissed – whether pleadings should be struck out – whether plaintiff should provide further particulars – SUBPOENAS whether plaintiff should be permitted to serve subpoenas before pleadings closed and before serving evidence – whether subpoenas should be set aside – relevance of Practice Note SC Eq 11 Legislation Cited: Practice Note SC Eq 11 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: In the matter of North Coast Transit Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 1912 New Price Retail Services v David Hannah; Australian Pharmaceutical Industries v David Hannah [2012] NSWSC 422 The Owners - Strata Plan 69567 v Baseline Constructions Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 502 Texts Cited: R P Balkin and J L R Davis, Law of Torts, (5th ed 2013, LexisNexis Butterworths) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: MyPet Brands Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/Respondent) Beonic Technologies Pty Ltd (Defendant/Applicant) Representation: Counsel: A P Cheshire SC (Plaintiff/Respondent)
Solicitors: Mills Oakley (Plaintiff/Respondent) S R Legal (Defendant/Applicant) File Number(s): SC 2016/205870
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate