NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cheng v Farjudi [2016] NSWCA 316 Hearing dates: 21 September 2016 Decision date: 21 November 2016 Before: Beazley P at [1]; Ward JA at [129]; Harrison J at [130] Decision: (1) Order 1 made on 11 December 2015 be corrected pursuant to the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 36.17 so as to insert, in lieu of the judgment sum $210,927, the sum of $200,099;
(2) Appeal dismissed;
(3) The appellant to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: DAMAGES – exemplary damages – whether trial judge erred in awarding exemplary damages – basis for award of exemplary damages – where conduct has been subject to sanction by the criminal law – whether "substantial punishment" – whether separate basis existed for award of exemplary damages – conduct of civil proceedings after plea of guilty – whether conduct of civil proceedings formed appropriate basis for award of exemplary damages
DAMAGES – out-of-pocket expenses – award made for future out-of-pocket expenses – whether proper basis in evidence for award
TORTS – intentional torts – assault and battery – altercation between plaintiff and defendant – whether trial judge erred in relation to factual findings Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Cases Cited: BHP Billiton Ltd v Parker [2012] SASFC 73 Brockway v Pando [2000] WASCA 192 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Carter v Walker [2010] VSCA 340; 32 VR 1 Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd v Mahommed [2010] NSWCA Cotogno v Lamb (No 3) (1986) 5 NSWLR 559 Cramer v Geraldton Building Company [2004] WASCA 289 Daniels v Thompson [1998] NZCA 3; [1998] 3 NZLR 22 De Reus v Gray [2003] VSCA 84; 9 VR 432 Fernando v Commonwealth [2014] FCAFC 181; 231 FCR 251 Giller v Procopets [2008] VSCA 236; 24 VR 1 Gray v Motor Accidents Commission [1998] HCA 70; 196 CLR 1 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Lamb v Cotogno [1987] HCA 47; 164 CLR 1 McFadzean v CMFEU [2007] VSCA 289; 20 VR 250 Niven v SS [2006] NSWCA 338 Noye v Robbins [2010] WASCA 83 R v Mauger [2012] NSWCCA 51 Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129 S v R [2004] WASCA 113 State of New South Wales v McMaster [2015] NSWCA 228 State of Victoria v Horvath [2002] VSCA 177; 6 VR 326 The Herald & Weekly Times v Popovic [2003] VSCA 161; 9 VR 1 Tilden v Gregg [2015] NSWCA 164 Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd [1966] HCA 40; 117 CLR 118 Vaysman v Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc [2014] FCAFC 60; 222 FCR 387 W v W [1999] 2 NZLR 1 Whitbread v Rail Corporation NSW [2011] NSWCA 130 Whitfeld v De Lauret & Co Ltd [1920] HCA 75; 29 CLR 71 Wilson v Horne [1999] TASSC 33; 8 Tas R 363 XL Petroleum (NSW) Pty Ltd v Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 12; 155 CLR 448 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jeffrey Wai Chan Cheng (Appellant) Rostam Farjudi (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D H Murr SC; M Fraser (Appellant) G Parker SC; J de Greenlaw (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate