NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tsui v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2016] NSWCATOD 143 Hearing dates: 4 August 2016 Date of orders: 21 November 2016 Decision date: 21 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: N S Isenberg, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW – Home Building Act – endorsed contractor licence – general building category – relevant industry experience. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Home Building Act 1989 Cases Cited: lvanovski v Commissioner for NSW Fair Trading, Department of Finance and Services [2013] NSWADT 274 Locking v Department of Finance and Services [2013) NSWADT 239 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sunny Yuk Sang Tsui (Applicant) Commissioner for Fair Trading (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Sunny Yuk Sang Tsui (Applicant in person) Fair Trading Legal Services, Office of Finance and Services (Respondent) File Number(s): 1620029
Reasons for decision
Background 1. On 20 August 2015, the Commissioner for Fair Trading, through NSW Fair Trading (the Agency), received an application from Mr Tsui for an individual contractor licence to enable him to carry out general building work pursuant to the Home Building Act 1989 (the Act). 2. On 28 September 2015, the Agency issued Mr Tsui a letter informing him that his application had been assessed and refused. The Agency had determined that Mr Tsui had not satisfied relevant practical experience requirements and information submitted by the Applicant in relation to the dates on which he worked on various sites was "inconsistent and incorrect". 3. Mr Tsui requested the Agency to internally review the refusal decision. He attached to his request several references and other documents. 4. The Agency informed the Applicant by letter of 20 January 2016 that the refusal decision had been reviewed and was confirmed for reasons set out in the letter. 5. On 29 January 2016 the Applicant applied to the Tribunal to review the internal review decision (the Decision).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate