NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Stanton (WA) Pty Ltd (in Liq) v Vasquez Investments Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1635 Hearing dates: 11 November 2016 Date of orders: 11 November 2016 Decision date: 11 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: The Court:
(1) Makes Order 1 in the Notice of Motion filed 9 November 2016.
(2) Reserves the costs of the Motion to the Trial Judge Catchwords: SUBMITTING APPEARANCE – Application by second defendant for leave to file affidavit from managing director of sixth defendant – sixth defendant filed submitting appearance – whether attempt to circumvent UCPR 6.11 – whether evidence sought to be adduced potentially relevant to first and second defendants' case – leave granted Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Property Law Act 1969 (WA) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Highland v Labraga (No 3) [2006] NSWSC 871 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Stanton (WA) Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) (Plaintiff/Respondent) Vasquez Investments Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Bryve Resources Pty Ltd (Second Defendant/Applicant) Robert Paul Stanton (Third Defendant) Lachlan Townend (Fourth Defendant) Vasquez (WA) Pty Ltd (Fifth Defendant) Shareholder Services Pty Ltd (Sixth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: PT Russell (Plaintiff) D Barlin (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate