NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Khalid v Legal Aid Commission of NSW [2016] NSWSC 1640 Hearing dates: 15 November 2016 Date of orders: 28 November 2016 Decision date: 28 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bellew J Decision: 1. The proceedings are dismissed.
2. The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Judicial Review – Plaintiff one of six accused facing a charge of conspiring to do an act in preparation for a terrorist act or acts – Where plaintiff had engaged a solicitor shortly after his arrest in December 2014 – Where that solicitor had acted for him absent a grant of legal aid for almost two years – Where the solicitor was not a member of the relevant panel of legal practitioners created by the defendant for the purposes of assignment of grants of legal aid in complex criminal cases – Where the guidelines promulgated by the defendant provided that exceptional circumstances were required to be established before an assignment of a grant of legal aid in such a matter could be made to a practitioner who was not a member of the relevant panel – Where the plaintiff had expressed a preference to be represented at his trial by his present solicitor – Where the defendant assigned the grant of legal aid to another solicitor – Whether the defendant failed to take relevant matters into account in reaching that decision – Whether the defendant's decision was unreasonable in all of the circumstances Legislation Cited: Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Legal Aid Commission Act 1979 (NSW) Cases Cited: Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Bromley London Borough Council v Greater London Council [1983] 1 AC 768 Conyngham & Ors v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1986) 68 ALR 423 Gamble v Emerald Hill Electrical Pty Limited [2010] VSC 611 Legal Services Commission v Stephens (1981) 2 NSWLR 698 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24; [1986] HCA 40 Minister for Corrections NSW v Elomar (No. 2) [2016] NSWSC 1040 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332; [2013] HCA 13 R v Khalid (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1921 Secretary of State for Education and Science v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council [1977] AC 1014 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sulayman Khalid – Plaintiff Legal Aid Commission of NSW - Defendant Representation: Counsel: P Gray SC and G Foster – Plaintiff K Richardson SC and V McWilliam – Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate