NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Coote v Price [2016] NSWSC 1658 Hearing dates: 28 October 2016; further submissions 8 November 2016 Decision date: 24 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Stevenson J Decision: First plaintiff entitled to damages against deceased's estate for breach of promise to maintain life policies – first plaintiff entitled to sue deceased's estate on behalf of daughters to enforce benefit of promise to leave daughters share of business – constructive trust to be imposed and account of profits ordered Catchwords: CONTRACT – agreement made in California by deceased to maintain life policies for benefit of former wife and to leave to two of his daughters half of his interest in a hotel business in New South Wales – agreement governed by law of California – where deceased allowed policies to lapse – whether former wife entitled to damages against deceased's estate – where deceased made will inconsistent with promise in Californian agreement and which only gave benefit to daughters of share in the business after death of deceased's de facto partner; PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW – whether Court should presume law in California the same as in New South Wales; EQUITY – trusts – constructive trust – whether former wife held benefit of Californian agreement on trust for deceased's daughters – whether former wife able to enforce agreement that agreement against deceased's estate on behalf of the daughters; EQUITABLE REMEDIES – whether constructive trust should be imposed over deceased's share in the business in favour of daughters pending taking of an account Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Aslan v Kope [1995] NSWCA 26 Baird v Smee [2000] NSWCA 253 Birmingham v Renfrew (1937) 57 CLR 666; HCA 52 at 683 Campbell v Campbell [2015] NSWSC 784 Dalton v Ellis; Estate of Bristow (2005) 65 NSWLR 134; NSWSC 1252 Delaforce v Simpson-Cook (2010) 78 NSWLR 483; NSWCA 84 Neilson v Overseas Projects Corporation of Victoria Ltd (2005) 223 CLR 331; HCA 54 Regie National des Usines Renault SA V Zhang (2002) 210 CLR 491; HCA 10 Tonkiss v Graham [2002] NSWSC 1093 Texts Cited: M Davies, A S Bell and P L G Brereton, Nygh's Conflict of Laws in Australia, (9th ed 2014, LexisNexis Butterworths) N Seddon, R Bigwood, M Ellinghaus, Cheshire & Fifoot: Law of Contract, (10th ed 2012, LexisNexis) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Carol Coote (First Plaintiff) Diane Coote (Second Plaintiff) Suzanne Coote (Third Plaintiff) Amanda Elizabeth Price (First Defendant) Ella Kathleen Montgomery (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: F G Lever SC (Plaintiffs)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate