NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CHK v Children's Guardian [2016] NSWCATAD 276 Hearing dates: 24 June 2016 Date of orders: 28 November 2016 Decision date: 28 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: L Organ, Senior Member E Hayes, General Member Decision: (1) The decision of the Children's Guardian made 9 November 2015 to refuse the Applicant's Working with Children Check clearance is set aside. (2) In substitution for that decision, the following decision is made; The applicant is granted a Working with Children Check clearance Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW – child protection – review of decision of the respondent to refuse the applicant's application for a working with children check clearance – applicant acquitted at criminal trial - whether the applicant posed a real and appreciable risk to children. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012(NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: AYU v NSW Office of the Children's Guardian [2014] NSWCATAD 69 BJB v Office of the Children's Guardian [2014] NSWCATAD 111 BKE v Office of Children's Guardian & Anor [2015] NSWSC 523 Commission for Children and Young People v V [2002] NSWSC 949 Commission for Children and Young People v FZ [2011] NSWCATAD 69 Control Investments Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (No 2) (1981) 3 ALD 88 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v QAAH of 2004 [2006] Re Eckersley and Minister for Capital Territory (1979) 2 ALD 303 Holbrook and Australian Postal Commission (1983) 5 ALN N46 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Pochi (1980) 4 ALD 139; BJB No. 2 M v M [1988] HCA 68 Office of the Children's Guardian v CFW [2016] NSWSC 1406 YG and GG v Minister for Community Services [2002] NSWCA 247 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CHK (Applicant) Children's Guardian (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Guterres (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate