NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Baias v R [2016] NSWCCA 269 Hearing dates: 19 August 2016 Decision date: 30 November 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Campbell J at [2] Button J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – serious offences of manufacture and supply with respect to methylamphetamine and heroin – whether sentencing judge was sufficiently precise in assessment of objective seriousness – whether mistaken belief of an applicant that a precursor was being supplied was taken into account – whether failure to state starting points of indicative head sentences established material error – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 23(4) Cases Cited: Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168; [2004] NSWCCA 131 Rios v R [2012] NSWCCA 8 Ruano v R [2011] NSWCCA 149 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jon Baias Regina Representation: Counsel: S Odgers SC (Applicant) S Dowling SC (Respondent)
Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2012/265272 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 18 September 2015 Before: Townsden DCJ File Number(s): 2012/265272
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate