NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Museth v Windsor Country Golf Club Ltd [2016] NSWCA 327 Hearing dates: 14/11/2016 Date of orders: 28 November 2016 Decision date: 28 November 2016 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Barrett AJA at [2]; McDougall J at [3] Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: TORT – nuisance – water runoff from golf club onto neighbour's property – whether cracking to walls and roof sag resulting from expansion / contraction of reactive clay was caused by water from defendant's premises – whether damage is structural or cosmetic
DAMAGES – nuisance – whether damage was structural or cosmetic – damages for underpinning – where no evidence of that cost – damages for demolition and rebuilding – where no evidence of that cost
EXPERT EVIDENCE – admissibility of expert evidence – whether expert evidence satisfies requirement for admissibility under s 79 of Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) – where absence of demonstrated reasoning process – whether it was open to the primary judge to receive that evidence – whether expert evidence supported claims for damages Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 76, 79, 135 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101(2)(r) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 31.28, 51.41 Cases Cited: Cole v The Commonwealth of Australia (1961) 106 CLR 653; [1961] HCA 87 Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588; [2011] HCA 21 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705; [2001] NSWCA 305 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Museth (Appellant) Windsor Country Golf Club Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: BJ Gross QC / TJ Boyd (Appellant) M Ashhurst SC / HJA Neal (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate