NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wilkes v Bykowski [2016] NSWSC 1685 Hearing dates: 24 November 2016 Date of orders: 01 December 2016 Decision date: 01 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: Judgment for the Plaintiff for the possession of the whole of the land in folio identifier 1/587234 situated at Lane Cove and known as 50A Bridge Street, Lane Cove in the State of New South Wales. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY – possession of land – plaintiff is registered proprietor of land – defendant in occupation of land – past de facto relationship between the parties – plaintiff seeks summary judgment for possession – defendant subsequently commences proceedings in Family Court – conciliation conference in Family Court – whether parties agreed to stay Supreme Court proceedings – whether Family Court registrar made order for stay – whether registrar had power to make order - subsequent conduct of defendant inconsistent with agreement for stay – whether claim of de facto relationship was a defence to claim for possession – both parties desirous of sale of property – summary judgment for possession Legislation Cited: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Cases Cited: County Securities Pty Limited v Challenger Group Holdings Pty Limited & Anor [2008] NSWCA 193 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 Harris v Caladine (1991) 172 CLR 84 Harvey v Phillips (1956) 95 CLR 235 Holder v Zeiher [2014] NSWSC 556 Paino v Hofbauer (1988) 13 NSWLR 193 Siebe Gorman & Co Ltd v Pneupac Ltd [1982] 1 WLR 185; [1982] 1 All ER 377 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Leonie Margaret Wilkes (Plaintiff) Joseph Bykowski (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Afshar (Plaintiff) B Levet (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate