NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zverara v Jarpen Holdings Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAD 284 Hearing dates: 9 August 201629 August 2016 (final submissions) Date of orders: 02 December 2016 Decision date: 02 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: A Britton, Principal Member Decision: Leave is granted under s 96(1) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW), for the Complaint to proceed cast as a complaint of "indirect discrimination" in the area of accommodation on the grounds of sex and domestic or marital status. Catchwords: EQUAL OPPORTUNITY — leave required for complaint to proceed — principles applying to grant of leave EQUAL OPPORTUNITY — direct discrimination — "on the ground of" a proscribed ground — "a characteristic that generally appertains to" — "a characteristic generally imputed to" persons with the complainant's proscribed ground EQUAL OPPORTUNITY — indirect discrimination — formulation of condition or requirement Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Iron and Steel Pty Limited v Banovic [1989] HCA 56; (1989) 168 CLR 165 Bonella & Ors v Wollongong City Council [2001] NSWADT 194 Catholic Education Office v Clarke [2004] FCAFC 197; (2004) 138 FCR 121 Jones & Anor v Ekermawi [2009] NSWCA 388 Ekermawi v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales & Ors [2009] NSWSC 143 Kemp v Minister for Education & Anor (1991) EOC ¶92-340 State of New South Wales v Amery [2006] HCA 14; (2006) 230 CLR 174 Walker v State of Victoria [2011] FCA 258 Waters v Public Transport Corporation [1991] HCA 49; (1991) 173 CLR 349 Texts Cited: CCH, Australian and NZ Equal Opportunity Law and Practice Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Irina Zvereva (Applicant) Jarpen Holdings Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Jaques Ostrowski (Second Respondent) Fang Ostrowski (Third Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Irina Zvereva (Applicant in person) F D'Alessandro (Agent for First Respondent) Jaques Ostrowski (Second & Third Respondent) File Number(s): 1610411
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate