NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Centocinquanta Pty Limited v Demasi [2016] NSWSC 1689 Hearing dates: 24 November 2016 Date of orders: 28 November 2016 Decision date: 28 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Application for interlocutory injunctive relief refused. Catchwords: LANDLORD AND TENANT – retail and commercial tenancies legislation – alleged creation of oral retail lease – whether serious question as to whether a retail lease existed between plaintiff and registered proprietor – whether serious question as to whether a retail lease existed between plaintiff and head lessee Legislation Cited: Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57; [2006] HCA 46 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Centocinquanta Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Natalina Demasi (First Defendant) 86 Dunning Avenue Pty Limited (Second Defendant) NFG Crows Nest Pty Limited (Third Defendant) JYJ Meats and Foods Limited (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr M J Neil QC with Mr S O'Brien (Plaintiff) Mr E Demir (solicitor) (First Defendant) Mr M Henry SC (Second Defendant) Mr R Chia (Third Defendant) Mr N Carney (Fourth Defendant)
Solicitors: AJL Legal (Plaintiff) Shanahans Butlers Solicitors (First Defendant) Herro Solicitors (Second Defendant) Murdock Cheng Legal Practice (Third Defendant) Juris Cor Legal (Fourth Defendant) File Number(s): 2016/65910 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate