NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Nominal Defendant v Dowedeit [2016] NSWCA 332 Hearing dates: 20 May 2016 Decision date: 01 December 2016 Before: Meagher JA at [1] Gleeson JA at [2] Simpson JA at [139] Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed. 2. Cross-appeal dismissed. 3. Appellant pay 90% of the respondent's costs in this Court. Catchwords: TORTS – negligence – Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) Pt 1.2 Div 1 – blameless accident – where successful claim for damages against Nominal Defendant in lower court – whether respondent hit by motor vehicle or fell from balcony – where primary judge found collision with motor vehicle most likely cause of respondent's injuries – where respondent found lying on footpath with serious injuries – challenge to factual finding of respondent's rest position on footpath – whether inconsistent with witness and expert evidence – where competing witness evidence and police photographs of site of accident – challenge to factual finding of respondent's belief he was hit by a car – where respondent gave contemporaneous account to police and hospital staff of going out to corner shop – credibility of respondent – whether primary judge erred in finding expert evidence of little assistance – consistency of expert evidence with nature of respondent's injuries and other evidence
TORTS - negligence - contributory negligence – Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) s 138 – whether primary judge erred in finding contributory negligence by respondent and assessing reduction in damages at 50% – where finding that respondent's failure to look caused accident – where relatively quiet street – where little otherwise known of circumstances of accident – whether assessment manifestly inadequate or excessive Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) ss 3B, 5B, 5R, 5S Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1965 (NSW) s 9 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) Pt 1.2, Div 1, ss 138, 7A, 7C Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 75A Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.1 Cases Cited: Axiak v Ingram (2012) 82 NSWLR 36; [2012] NSWCA 311 Davis v Swift (2014] 69 MVR 375; [2014] NSWCA 458 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Gordon v Truong (2014) 66 MVR 241; [2014] NSWCA 97 Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd [1985] 59 ALJR 492; [1985] HCA 34 Nominal Defendant v Green (2013) 64 MVR 354 [2013] NSWCA 219 Dowedeit v Nominal Defendant [2015] NSWDC 182 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nominal Defendant (Appellant) Ronald Dowedeit (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr JB Turnbull SC with Ms S Warren (Appellant) Mr PJ Doherty SC with Mr D Morgan (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate