NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Martin v R [2016] NSWCCA 273 Hearing dates: 30 November 2016 Decision date: 30 November 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Adams J at [2]; R A Hulme J at [5] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal against sentence granted. 2. Appeal against sentence dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – armed robbery with wounding – Crimes Act 1900 s 98 – no failure to identify and assess factors relevant to the objective seriousness of the offence – no failure to give effect to a finding of special circumstances in imposing a sentence partially accumulated on a balance of parole – no error in having regard to the victim as a "vulnerable person" in the circumstances – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 98 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) s 166 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 44(2) Cases Cited: Callaghan v R [2006] NSWCCA 58; 160 A Crim R 145 Caristo v R [2011] NSWCCA 7 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; 46 NSWLR 346 R v Huynh [2003] NSWCCA 239 R v Moffitt (1990) 20 NSWLR 114 R v Tadrosse [2005] NSWCCA 145; 65 NSWLR 740 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ridge Martin (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Schaudin (Applicant) Mr E Balodis (Crown)
Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2014/261981 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Date of Decision: 11 September 2015 Before: King SC DCJ File Number(s): 2014/261981
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate