NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Russo v Brack [2016] NSWCATAP 261 Hearing dates: 10 October 2016 Date of orders: 01 December 2016 Decision date: 01 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: R Seiden SC, Senior Member J Kearney, Senior Member Decision: Extension of time to commence proceeding is refused. Catchwords: DENIAL OF NATURAL JUSTICE PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS – opportunity to present case Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act, 2013 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules, 2014 Residential Tenancies Act, 2010 Cases Cited: Allesch v Maunz (2000) 203 CLR 172 Bhikkhu v Colvin Family Superannuation Fund [2016] NSWCATCD 29 Kenny v Beevers (Tenancy) [2011] NSWCTTT 133 Nicholas v Miernik (Tenancy) [2011] NSWCTTT 293 Pearson v Clark [2016] NSWCATAP 134 Raslan v Pan [2015] NSWCATAP 12 Volfneuk v McCardle (Tenancy) [2002] NSWCTTT 460 Waters v Waghorn [2016] NSWCATAP 247 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John (Giovanni) Russo (Appellant) Kelly Brack, Elizabeth Skillen and Emma Breese (Respondents) Representation: Solicitors: Derek Davelaar Solicitor (Appellant) File Number(s): AP 16/36680 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Date of Decision: 17 June 2016 Before: D Moss, Member File Number(s): RT 15/68344 and RT 16/21348
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate