Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Australian Development Investments Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 605 033 074 v Blacktown City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1567 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 7 October and 9, 10 November 2016 Date of orders: 10 November 2016 Decision date: 10 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Hussey AC Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: subdivision for three lots, infrastructure, stormwater design, landscaping/public domain, conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: AUSTRALIAN DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENTS HOLDING PTY LTD (ACN 605 033 074) (Applicant) BLACKTOWN CITY COUNCIL (Respodent) Representation: Mr R Riddle, Gadens Lawyers Sydney (Applicant) Mr M Cottom, Loval Government & Planning Law (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/212168 Publication restriction: No Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are: 1. The applicant is granted leave to rely on the following amended plans prepared by Wood & Grieve Engineers dated 11 October 2016: 1. General Arrangement Plan (number C-101 Revision 10); 2. Stormwater Drainage Plans (numbers C-201 to C-208 Revision 06); 3. Stormwater Drainage Standard Details (number C-211 Revision 05); 4. Stormwater Drainage Longsections (numbers C-221 to C-223 Revision 06); 5. Stormwater Drainage - Information Tables (number C-225 Revision 05); 6. Temporary Basin Sections (number C-226 Revision 01); and 7. Stormwater Catchment Plan (number C-231 Revision 05). 1. The applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended landscape plans prepared by Arcadia Landscape Architecture dated October 2016 (12 sheets). 2. The appeal is upheld. 3. Development Application DA15/02765 for the demolition of existing structures, tree removal, bulk earthworks, roadworks, landscaping and subsequent amalgamation and subdivision of Lot 11 Section J in DP193074, Lot 110 in DP1200460, and Lot 12 in DP1190560, also known as 223 and 225 Grange Avenue, and 999 Richmond Road Marsden Park NSW 2765 is determined by the granting of consent subject to the conditions in Annexure "A". ……………. Acting Commissioner Hussey 212168.16 Hussey (C) (547 KB, pdf) DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 30 November 2016