NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Abdallah v R [2016] NSWCCA 275 Hearing dates: 17 August 2016 Date of orders: 02 December 2016 Decision date: 02 December 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Campbell J at [72] Button J at [87] Decision: (1) The appeal against conviction is upheld. (2) The conviction for manslaughter is quashed. (3) There should be a new trial on a count of manslaughter. Catchwords: CONVICTION APPEAL – manslaughter – altercation between two women leading to one stabbing the other – whether proper directions given as to manslaughter by excessive self-defence – whether if directions were erroneous a miscarriage of justice occurred – whether adequate directions given as to lies and consciousness of guilt – whether verdict unreasonable – conviction appeal allowed – Retrial limited to manslaughter ordered. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) - ss 18(1)(a), 24, 418, 419, 421 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) – ss 10, 21A(2)(j) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – ss 5, 6(1) Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), r 4 Cases Cited: Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd v the Queen (2012) 246 CLR 92; [2012] HCA 14 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 Doggett v The Queen [2001] HCA 46; 208 CLR 343 Filippou v The Queen [2015] HCA 29; 256 CLR 47 Grant v R [2014] NSWCCA 67 Hadchiti v R [2016] NSWCCA 63 (decision restricted) Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 House v R [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Justins v The Queen [2010] NSWCCA 242; 79 NSWLR 544 Makarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Moore v R [2016] NSWCCA 185 Olbrich v R [1999] HCA 54; 199 CLR 270 Sio v The Queen [2016] HCA 32; 90 ALJR 963 Smith v R [2015] NSWCCA 193 Stanton v R [2003] HCA 29; 77 ALJR 1151 Vo v The Queen [2013] VSCA 225; 39 VR 543 Weiss v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 300 Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584 Yousif v R [2014] NSWCCA 180 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Katherine Abdallah – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: T Game SC/Ms A Francis – Applicant Ms S Dowling SC – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate